ext_13243 ([identity profile] dd-b.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] pameladean 2011-09-13 01:56 pm (UTC)

Having a minor, non-viewpoint character who might be gay (or two, in this case) is very different from having a protagonist who has an ongoing relationship with somebody of the same sex during the book. Defining anything beyond some line to be "gay fantasy" doesn't seem useful to me exactly, at least as a basis for our future behavior.

I do see the utility of having some vaguely clear definition to use for counting things already published and coming up with statistics.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting