pameladean: (0)
pameladean ([personal profile] pameladean) wrote 2004-03-05 02:34 pm (UTC)

You make a lot of sense, but I don't think that's what he meant. That stricture is in a collection about characterization, and I don't somehow think he'd refer to goodness in a work of fiction overall as being sexy or not, I think he'd just use it of people. This is getting fairly far into weird exegesis, I do admit.

Pamela

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting