Mystery Rose
Jun. 10th, 2007 12:48 pmThe white rose of York bloomed copiously this year, providing great pleasure and an artless sprinkling of shed white petals in the unmown grass. Until a March snowstorm took out the bulk of the neighbors' ancient lilac, the white rose of York had been a leggy plant, with most of its leaves and bloom on top. Since the lilac went down, it's been making up for lost time with leaves all the way down the canes and many more canes. I had wondered early this spring about two of the new canes, which were exceptionally long but leafed out much later than the others. Those canes are blooming now. The roses are not white, but a deep velvety red. They are not stray canes from the nearby Henry Kelsey; the Henry Kelsey has flatter blossoms and its red has more yellow. These flowers look, in fact, just like the white rose of York, only, unaccountably, they're red.
I am not a rosarian. Does anybody know what's going on here? I'm perfectly happy with it, but I'm curious. I can't recall if this rose is own-root or grafted, but I'm fairly certain that it's the latter.
In less good news from the yard, I had to collect three dead baby rabbits and send them to their eternal rest this morning, and I was lucky not to have mown them up. Poor little guys.
In other news, the book continues to surprise me, but not as quickly as I want it to. I'm rereading all the Sue Grafton mysteries. I suggested to David and Lydy that maybe this was because my specific goal in writing this book is to have love and rhetoric without the blood, so maybe I need a bit of blood in my reading. David, however, said that Sue Grafton was so peaceful, and indeed, compared to many mystery writers (we discussed Rex Stout specifically), she is.
P.
I am not a rosarian. Does anybody know what's going on here? I'm perfectly happy with it, but I'm curious. I can't recall if this rose is own-root or grafted, but I'm fairly certain that it's the latter.
In less good news from the yard, I had to collect three dead baby rabbits and send them to their eternal rest this morning, and I was lucky not to have mown them up. Poor little guys.
In other news, the book continues to surprise me, but not as quickly as I want it to. I'm rereading all the Sue Grafton mysteries. I suggested to David and Lydy that maybe this was because my specific goal in writing this book is to have love and rhetoric without the blood, so maybe I need a bit of blood in my reading. David, however, said that Sue Grafton was so peaceful, and indeed, compared to many mystery writers (we discussed Rex Stout specifically), she is.
P.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:03 pm (UTC)Poor bunnies :(
no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:06 pm (UTC)I don't think of Sue Grafton OR Rex Stout as being particularly bloody. Sue Grafton is physical, as is Marcia Muller and Sara Paretsky, but I don't remember a lot of blood. Rex Stout is, of course, mental.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 07:58 pm (UTC)spectre
Date: 2007-06-10 08:52 pm (UTC)http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/pl.php?n=6547
http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=1.6788
But this does sound like it might be the rootstock?
In coincidoinkery, I just discovered what I think is a sport on my Canadien Explorer rose at the park. Just one branch and coming off the main plant. The flowers are doubled and more strongly scented than the parent.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 10:19 pm (UTC)I think of them as fairly peaceful, myself. From what Sue Grafton I've read, I'd say she was less peaceful. Mileage clearly varies.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 01:38 am (UTC)The R+G reference is making me wish for your book to be done and available for purchase even more than I already was. And anyway there was plenty of blood in The Dubious Hills, I think.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 03:10 am (UTC)love
Catherine, who couldn't resist
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 03:17 am (UTC)I hadn't thought of it, but Grafton is rather bloodless -- altho I think that's part of why I like her, altho I think her formula got really tired. The last few books have picked up some for me, tho.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-16 02:21 pm (UTC)Turns out I don't have your address and can't find it in any of my usual resources, which means that I can't send you HENSLOWE'S DIARY, which is all packed up and waiting to come to you. Could you please email me at cordsher at gmail dot com?
New York is wonderful, by the way, but I do miss my garden. We lost all the climbing roses three years ago, to a particularly horrendous winter, but the lilacs would be blooming now, and the double-flowering cherry outside the bedroom window. Here, we have Riverside Park (which is not to be sneezed at) and a back alley strangely full of sun and possibility, once the crumbling back wall is repaired enough to put up a trellis. At the moment, however, I am bereft of dirt to play in and a little (just a little, though) wistful.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-16 04:54 pm (UTC)Email with address should arrive momentarily.
P.
Re: spectre
Date: 2007-06-18 09:47 pm (UTC)Re: spectre
Date: 2007-06-18 10:21 pm (UTC)P
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 10:23 pm (UTC)P.
Re: spectre
Date: 2007-06-19 12:11 am (UTC)Re: spectre, and cuttings.. and yeah
Date: 2007-06-19 12:32 am (UTC)It does definitely deserve a try. :-)
roses
Date: 2007-06-27 10:56 am (UTC)H.C. Grant
no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 06:16 am (UTC)