Date: 2016-03-03 11:21 pm (UTC)
pameladean: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pameladean
I have no idea. I first actually noticed it in the facsimile hardcover, which I was reading very carefully for the first time, though of course it was rereading of the actual book; and just assumed that it had been corrected in paperback editions later on. Then I became curious and checked. Nope, it's there all the time. I haven't made any kind of study of Sayers's manuscript history; I don't know if anybody else has either. I was so put off by the first biography and critical study of her that I read that I've pretty much been avoiding such things since.

P.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

pameladean: (Default)
pameladean

January 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 05:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios