And about that novel
Sep. 1st, 2008 11:35 pmFor those of you who don't read this journal for my oh-so-sharp, terrifically original political raving, an update.
At the end of July I had gotten through the end of Volume 1 of the novel. I emailed my editor and asked if I should make an effort to get the manuscript to her the next day or if Monday would do. She wrote back to say that another manuscript being published several seasons sooner than mine was just about to land on her desk, and I should take my time. A few exchanges made me realize that she meant, really, that I should take my time.
This was just as well, since Eric, heroically reading right behind my frenzied revisions, discovered a continuity error, or more accurately, a time warp, created by my splitting chapters and attempting to retain the strict alternation between the two viewpoint characters, Ruth and Arry. It also meant that Raphael could read the revised version and point out any other difficulties.
I've been working on resolving the time warp ever since. This book is my version of Love and Rhetoric without the Blood, so I am not going to bring in any people with guns, but I have been attempting to make all the additional episodes I'm writing have less conversation and more events in them than has been the case for this volume so far. As is usual with my drafts, most of the action is concentrated in Volume 2. So fixing the time warp has created a better balance, I believe.
I've been complaining volubly to anybody who will listen, but I'm not actually as tired of this book as I expected to be. I believe it has a smidgen of merit.
Golly, I just tried to spell "smidgen" like "pigeon." I think I should go to bed. Sweet dreams, you guys.
Pamela
At the end of July I had gotten through the end of Volume 1 of the novel. I emailed my editor and asked if I should make an effort to get the manuscript to her the next day or if Monday would do. She wrote back to say that another manuscript being published several seasons sooner than mine was just about to land on her desk, and I should take my time. A few exchanges made me realize that she meant, really, that I should take my time.
This was just as well, since Eric, heroically reading right behind my frenzied revisions, discovered a continuity error, or more accurately, a time warp, created by my splitting chapters and attempting to retain the strict alternation between the two viewpoint characters, Ruth and Arry. It also meant that Raphael could read the revised version and point out any other difficulties.
I've been working on resolving the time warp ever since. This book is my version of Love and Rhetoric without the Blood, so I am not going to bring in any people with guns, but I have been attempting to make all the additional episodes I'm writing have less conversation and more events in them than has been the case for this volume so far. As is usual with my drafts, most of the action is concentrated in Volume 2. So fixing the time warp has created a better balance, I believe.
I've been complaining volubly to anybody who will listen, but I'm not actually as tired of this book as I expected to be. I believe it has a smidgen of merit.
Golly, I just tried to spell "smidgen" like "pigeon." I think I should go to bed. Sweet dreams, you guys.
Pamela
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:06 am (UTC)To poison a pigeon in the park!
'Night.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:14 am (UTC)I had just the same reaction.
(well, and also 'Want book! Want to read book!', but that sort of goes without saying)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:31 am (UTC)Oh, yeah.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 08:28 am (UTC)And the good news? Actually you can spell it halfway like "pigeon"; "smidgeon" is a perfectly legitimate variant, and the one I use by choice.
For almost exactly this reason, I expect.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:35 pm (UTC)*checks profile, and notes with delight a fellow obsessive cook*
And if you do get here, you really, really want to visit Books for Cooks in Gertrude St, Fitzroy. Not only is it a gorgeous palace of cookbooks, but it has all these fascinating historic cookbooks and 19th century manuals on how to run a household and which servants do what, or 17th century etiquette guides, and basically I could just move in and live there.
(after all, the entire purpose of visiting other countries is to acquire more books, no?)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:46 pm (UTC)But of course! I am still angry and regretful over a time I was in Seoul, and there was this two-volume boxed set of beautiful coffee-table books all about kimchi: one on the history and science, one on recipes. I really wanted the set, but it was (a) costly and (b) heavy, and I chickened out. Shame on me...
Never been to Melbourne, nor anywhere in Australia; am pining to come, checking e-mail a dozen times a day, like that...
And Books for Cooks is now utterly on my provisional itinerary; thank you very much!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 01:11 am (UTC)*envisages bookshop crawl*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 08:23 am (UTC)Oh, and I forgot to offer my congratulations on Melbourne's becoming an official UNESCO City of Literature (which is what the study tour's all about).
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:24 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:25 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:26 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 11:32 pm (UTC)Okay, can't deny that.
And yay for soon!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:22 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:23 pm (UTC)I expect the "no longer able to look at it" stage to coincide with receiving the copy-edited manuscript. That's usually how it works.
P.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:26 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:26 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 04:26 pm (UTC);-)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 04:13 am (UTC)*pines for book but is distracted by 100000 pages of 19th century anthropologists discussing 'promiscuity' - gah!*
(Needless to say, this is for a required class. Hm, I guess that makes all our discussion tomorrow a class-based analysis. :) Just to annoy people further, I *think* what the guy means by promiscuity is matrilineal kinship systems. Gah.)
Smidgen
Date: 2008-09-05 03:56 pm (UTC)Jane
(Yolen)
Re: Smidgen
Date: 2008-09-05 06:56 pm (UTC)(And I never thanked you for coming to my reading at Minicon. I was delighted.)
P.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-14 06:33 am (UTC)woohoo!
Date: 2008-09-19 11:24 am (UTC)