Nature red in tooth and claw
Nov. 12th, 2009 03:26 pmTuesday was a very instructive day in two different ways
Raphael and I went for a walk, since it was glorious late-fall day. As we were coming home, we saw a hawk in an ash tree at 37th and Blaisdell. It was eating some small bird, sending bits of down and the occasional feather floating away in the sunny air. It was a rangy hawk with a streaky breast and a rather long tail. We followed it into our alley, where it perched on the power line while house sparrows sat in the hedges making alarmed noises. Then it flew off over the decaying parking lot of the former mortuary, swooping very low over the ground, and vanished into some trees. We looked it up in Sibley, and, like the hawk we've seen a few times in our yard, it was a juvenile Cooper's hawk. I've never had such a good, long look at one before -- the branch it was on wasn't all that high, though it was well above our heads.
My friend Cindy knows all the cool things about theater in this town. She had kindly offered Eric and me her extra free tickets to see The Importance of Being Earnest, so we reciprocated by inviting her along with us to see Theater in the Round's Much Ado About Nothing. She couldn't go, because she was working, but our joint email lamentations about how we never saw shows together caused her to invite us to come to the free production of Othello being done by Ten Thousand Things in the basement of St. Stephen's Church.
We had a nice dinner beforehand at the Java, Cindy and her partner and Eric and I, talking about theater and, a little, about politics.
The venue was somewhat unsalubrious, but neither the glaring fluorescent lights, the overheating, or the hard metal chairs mattered in the slightest once the players began. They had been milling about beforehand, since there was no backstage, just an empty square of old vinyl tile floor surrounded by two or three rows of folding chairs on each side, and a little group of musicians. I amused myself by trying to pick out who was playing whom. There was an upright, sharp-faced, earnest-looking fellow that I decided must be Iago, but he wasn't. He was Rodrigo, Iago's gull. (Or, as Eric pointed out, he was really Sir Andrew Aguecheek to Iago's Sir Toby, but they were in a much nastier universe.) Iago was somebody I'd have cast as Falstaff or Sir Toby, with a broad Minnesota accent and a completely guileless face. He was stupendous. It's easy, with Othello, to become impatient with the stupidity of everyone other than Iago, but this one really did seem very trustworthy. (I still thought Cassio was pretty clueless.) Iago was very funny early on, but I couldn't actually laugh, because I knew what would happen.
Othello was excellent too. He started out very genial and smiling, good at reconciliation, not, it seemed, easily moved to anger; but Iago knew just how to manage it. Desdemona was really splendid, energetic and straightforward, not at all submissive or shy. Emilia was also a very strong character. In their big scene together, Desdemona helped her make the bed, which made a very different impression than the more usual ways the scene is staged. Desdemona had entered humming the song, and they sang it together in snatches rather than there being any kind of formal performance.
Instead of Desdemona's father, they had her mother, who was a fine ranting scary parent. This actor also played Bianca, and was the best Bianca I've seen. This did not improve my opinion of Cassio at all, I have to say. And because Emilia was so sympathetic and strong, her repudiation of Bianca was especially distressing. Emilia knows women have to hang together in the kind of world the play depicts, but she hasn't quite gotten all the way to including Bianca.
The death scene was awful. I mean, it was well done, and so it had to be awful. Desdemona was not a large woman, but she fought all the way. I don't think I want to see this play again for quite a while, but they all did a wonderful job. We gave them a standing ovation. The audience was much more mixed than what one sees at the Guthrie, for example, and they were all, even fairly young kids, quite involved with the show.
Pamela
Raphael and I went for a walk, since it was glorious late-fall day. As we were coming home, we saw a hawk in an ash tree at 37th and Blaisdell. It was eating some small bird, sending bits of down and the occasional feather floating away in the sunny air. It was a rangy hawk with a streaky breast and a rather long tail. We followed it into our alley, where it perched on the power line while house sparrows sat in the hedges making alarmed noises. Then it flew off over the decaying parking lot of the former mortuary, swooping very low over the ground, and vanished into some trees. We looked it up in Sibley, and, like the hawk we've seen a few times in our yard, it was a juvenile Cooper's hawk. I've never had such a good, long look at one before -- the branch it was on wasn't all that high, though it was well above our heads.
My friend Cindy knows all the cool things about theater in this town. She had kindly offered Eric and me her extra free tickets to see The Importance of Being Earnest, so we reciprocated by inviting her along with us to see Theater in the Round's Much Ado About Nothing. She couldn't go, because she was working, but our joint email lamentations about how we never saw shows together caused her to invite us to come to the free production of Othello being done by Ten Thousand Things in the basement of St. Stephen's Church.
We had a nice dinner beforehand at the Java, Cindy and her partner and Eric and I, talking about theater and, a little, about politics.
The venue was somewhat unsalubrious, but neither the glaring fluorescent lights, the overheating, or the hard metal chairs mattered in the slightest once the players began. They had been milling about beforehand, since there was no backstage, just an empty square of old vinyl tile floor surrounded by two or three rows of folding chairs on each side, and a little group of musicians. I amused myself by trying to pick out who was playing whom. There was an upright, sharp-faced, earnest-looking fellow that I decided must be Iago, but he wasn't. He was Rodrigo, Iago's gull. (Or, as Eric pointed out, he was really Sir Andrew Aguecheek to Iago's Sir Toby, but they were in a much nastier universe.) Iago was somebody I'd have cast as Falstaff or Sir Toby, with a broad Minnesota accent and a completely guileless face. He was stupendous. It's easy, with Othello, to become impatient with the stupidity of everyone other than Iago, but this one really did seem very trustworthy. (I still thought Cassio was pretty clueless.) Iago was very funny early on, but I couldn't actually laugh, because I knew what would happen.
Othello was excellent too. He started out very genial and smiling, good at reconciliation, not, it seemed, easily moved to anger; but Iago knew just how to manage it. Desdemona was really splendid, energetic and straightforward, not at all submissive or shy. Emilia was also a very strong character. In their big scene together, Desdemona helped her make the bed, which made a very different impression than the more usual ways the scene is staged. Desdemona had entered humming the song, and they sang it together in snatches rather than there being any kind of formal performance.
Instead of Desdemona's father, they had her mother, who was a fine ranting scary parent. This actor also played Bianca, and was the best Bianca I've seen. This did not improve my opinion of Cassio at all, I have to say. And because Emilia was so sympathetic and strong, her repudiation of Bianca was especially distressing. Emilia knows women have to hang together in the kind of world the play depicts, but she hasn't quite gotten all the way to including Bianca.
The death scene was awful. I mean, it was well done, and so it had to be awful. Desdemona was not a large woman, but she fought all the way. I don't think I want to see this play again for quite a while, but they all did a wonderful job. We gave them a standing ovation. The audience was much more mixed than what one sees at the Guthrie, for example, and they were all, even fairly young kids, quite involved with the show.
Pamela
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 09:34 pm (UTC)I wish I'd seen this production. It sounds wonderful.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:31 pm (UTC)Part of the impact of Othello is its compactness. It may be Shakespeare's shortest play, I can't remember. There's almost no time to rest. This may be why I prefer Hamlet. You see a little more ordinary life before it all comes crashing down.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:44 pm (UTC)*sigh*
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 07:34 pm (UTC)Ha! Here is a list of plays by line length, from shortest to longest.
http://www.kinglear.org/shakespeare-plays-length
Macbeth is the shortest tragedy, but The Comedy of Errors is the shortest play. Othello is in the six longest, so I was completely out about that. All I can say is that it always seems to go fast. This includes when we did readings of it, so it can't be just that it's always cut to the bone.
I will have to rethink my theory, such as it is.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 09:35 pm (UTC)I also need a strong Desdemona for the play to work for me, though. The discussions about her in Stage Beauty are really fabulous, even if the point about acting styles is kind of anachronistic to the period.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:32 pm (UTC)This was the strongest Desdemona I've seen. The 19th century Shakespeare critics would have hated her. Ha. It sounds like I should read Stage Beauty. If I ever get the present novel off my back, I am writing one about the theater.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 07:22 pm (UTC)I haven't read Stage Beauty, only seen the movie, but I quite enjoyed it. And the notion of you doing a theatre-related novel . . . add me to the list of people in this thread complimenting your descriptions in Tam Lin. There's definitely an audience for that!
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 07:39 pm (UTC)My novel about the theater is all about imaginary theater in a secondary world, but I hope it will still be good.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:34 pm (UTC)And yeah, Shakespeare really did have a cast, a batch of actors, and I think it must have affected the kinds of parts he wrote, though I suppose that could have gone the other way, too, and he expanded the ways the actors could work with his characters. I'd sure like to have been a fly on the wall sometimes for their rehearsals.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 09:48 pm (UTC)I've always wondered about the Ten Thousand Things free productions. Could you gauge the audience reaction? Was there Q&A? I think the first production we saw was Miss Julie and the director told us about showing it in a women's prison and the inmates' take on the story. I gather there was some spontaneous audience participation (well-received).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:36 pm (UTC)The audience was enthralled, even a couple of kids who were, maybe, nine or so. Iago's humor got laughs, as did other mildly humorous scenes. But really, mostly, people just sat very still and drank it in. Once or twice Iago addressed an audience member, and that was well received.
And there was the standing ovation, of course.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 09:56 pm (UTC)I'm still comparing/contrasting the two Othellos. It is an embarrassment of riches to have two stunning (each in their own way) productions of the same play running in town at the same time, and I'm glad that the stars aligned in such a way that I could see them both. And with good company, too.
Ten Thousand Things' productions always remind me that good theatre doesn't need all the bells and whistles; if the story is told well, that's all that matters. I reallyreallyreally want to see what they do with My Fair Lady next year.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 10:42 pm (UTC)We see a lot of red-tailed hawks here. They've adapted nicely to the urban environment -- all those plump pigeons, well fed by the oldsters in the park.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:39 pm (UTC)We have lots of red-tailed hawks out by the airport and in the suburbs, but fewer further in. We have peregrines, and, still oddly to me, the Cooper's hawks.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:38 pm (UTC)I can't imagine that Ten Thousand Things' production of My Fair Lady will be anything like anybody else's, and I want to see it too.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:40 pm (UTC)I once saw a red-tailed hawk trying to catch a large snake, but in the end the snake got away and the hawk sulked.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 10:15 pm (UTC)Oh yah, you gotta be careful of those.
...what?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 10:30 pm (UTC)The delightful thing about a close friend so much younger than I am is how many things we each know about that have never come in the other's way, but that the other is certain to love.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:42 pm (UTC)I know what you mean about having younger friends. It's very satisfying.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 10:34 pm (UTC)It's been decades since I've seen Othello. Your review is evocative, and now I want to see the play again.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:43 pm (UTC)The only birds I've seen hawks taking around here are pigeons and house sparrows, and at least we have an abundance of each.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:43 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:45 pm (UTC)I am not sure that I actually like Othello, not the way I like Hamlet or Twelfth Night or even Measure for Measure. But I admire it.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:46 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:46 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 11:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:47 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:48 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 06:49 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 12:33 am (UTC)