Well, that was interesting. [Very self-centered and boring remarks follow.]
The Tor.com Heinlein blog symposium is over, I think. You would think I'd know myself better by now, but I didn't. Patrick had referred to it as a "slow-motion panel," and that made me think, "Good, good, I can handle that a lot better than a real one-hour panel."
Well, no. Just as with a real panel, I spent more time gnawing my fingernails than working on things to say; I managed an opening statement and one other set of remarks; my fellow panelists struck me speechless for a whole rainbow of reasons; and now that it's done I'm bursting with half-baked ideas, and, in this case, half-written blog posts (more than half of which I like more than half as much as they deserve). It doesn't matter what the medium is, everybody else is much, much faster than I am at doing this stuff.
There is one post, which I sent in too late, that is close enough to being what I wanted it to be that I can probably put it up at some point, behind a cut for those who are tired of Heinlein; or maybe even on my website, if I can get back into it after months of neglect. No, you aren't missing anything; I never actually made the website go live because I was so freaked out by the requirement to cut my book by seventy-five percent. It'd be nice to have the website up if the book ever gets published, but there's plenty of time for that.
And the wreckage of my book still awaits a miraculous touch to make it rise again, smaller, more compact, and stronger. I just finished Chapter 18 and chucked a lot of scenes into a new file optimistically labelled Chapter 19. Once more into the breach, and close the walls up with our darlings dead. Whee.
Pamela
The Tor.com Heinlein blog symposium is over, I think. You would think I'd know myself better by now, but I didn't. Patrick had referred to it as a "slow-motion panel," and that made me think, "Good, good, I can handle that a lot better than a real one-hour panel."
Well, no. Just as with a real panel, I spent more time gnawing my fingernails than working on things to say; I managed an opening statement and one other set of remarks; my fellow panelists struck me speechless for a whole rainbow of reasons; and now that it's done I'm bursting with half-baked ideas, and, in this case, half-written blog posts (more than half of which I like more than half as much as they deserve). It doesn't matter what the medium is, everybody else is much, much faster than I am at doing this stuff.
There is one post, which I sent in too late, that is close enough to being what I wanted it to be that I can probably put it up at some point, behind a cut for those who are tired of Heinlein; or maybe even on my website, if I can get back into it after months of neglect. No, you aren't missing anything; I never actually made the website go live because I was so freaked out by the requirement to cut my book by seventy-five percent. It'd be nice to have the website up if the book ever gets published, but there's plenty of time for that.
And the wreckage of my book still awaits a miraculous touch to make it rise again, smaller, more compact, and stronger. I just finished Chapter 18 and chucked a lot of scenes into a new file optimistically labelled Chapter 19. Once more into the breach, and close the walls up with our darlings dead. Whee.
Pamela
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 07:44 pm (UTC)Still thinking good thoughts for you and your book, as always.
Also, more than half of which I like more than half as much as they deserve = ♥
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 08:01 pm (UTC)And I love people who get my references.
P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 08:02 pm (UTC)I haven't looked into the Heinlein symposium, largely because I didn't think I would be able to keep up with its volume, but if it's archived I probably will, and would be very interested in your comments.
(Also, I just re-read "The Dubious Hills," and I'm still fascinated by what you did there. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 08:44 pm (UTC)Sometimes I feel as if somebody else wrote Hills. It was very weird to write, but I'm fond of it. Thank you.
P.
I think you have a false dichotomy.
Date: 2010-08-24 06:09 pm (UTC)I mean, for some people.
Just because we get things done quickly doesn't mean we're just tossing ideas out to sink or swim without bothering to craft them.
Re: I think you have a false dichotomy.
Date: 2010-08-24 07:14 pm (UTC)P.
Re: I think you have a false dichotomy.
Date: 2010-08-24 07:32 pm (UTC)Unfortunately for me, I happen not to be one of them (as evidenced by garbled message above). This is why I find myself uncomfortable with the fast pace of the online world - because I can't keep up.
On a related note, I did go check out the symposium. And I really enjoyed "The Right Kind of Girl." I always felt a certain kinship to Heinlein's characters myself, and I rarely hear anyone speak to that. Thank you!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 08:43 pm (UTC)I forgot to put in three examples, so I'll need to add those and smooth out some transitions.
P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 08:57 pm (UTC)thank you. this is a very good idea that i had not heard before. as a bonus, i have sour apple spray. (so godot will be able to DEMONSTRABLY taste bad)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 09:38 pm (UTC)http://www.actionext.com/names_v/voltaire_lyrics/goodnight_demon_slayer.html#
P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 11:29 pm (UTC)I'm totally sending it to all my friends with kids.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 11:51 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 12:19 am (UTC)Maybe I'll rewrite it. :P
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 06:39 pm (UTC)I liked the increasingly frantic nature of it, presumably because the kid still wasn't buying it.
P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 09:52 pm (UTC)K.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 10:12 pm (UTC)K.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 10:59 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 11:02 pm (UTC)The Tor.com discussion was supposed to involve people other than the usual suspects. It seemed much more civilized to me than many Heinlein discussions, though it certainly had its moments.
P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 11:05 pm (UTC)I'd love to see those links!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 11:17 pm (UTC)http://www.tor.com/blogs/2010/08/tomorrow-through-the-past
And this is Jo's response to that:
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2010/08/the-right-kind-of-girl
And here's my second post:
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2010/08/some-responses-to-the-opening-posts-of-the-heinlein-discussion
Not earthshaking, but there they are.
P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-20 11:25 pm (UTC)Yours and others' responses are a valuable reminder of the second half of the reader contract: what the reader brings to the table and how the text can change for them.
I am pretty sure I will never read Heinlein again (too many books I want to read, and diminishing time this side of fifty) but I do appreciate seeing him appreciated through the eyes of readers I respect.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 06:42 pm (UTC)I perfectly understand people who can't tolerate a moment of Heinlein, it just doesn't take me that way.
P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 01:44 am (UTC)I also look for the day when you put out a call for the full book. We could pre-order the book and fund to pay for the publication.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 06:40 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 06:41 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-21 06:43 pm (UTC)Well, I can take less than that, but I usually regret it.
This excludes conversations about where to go for dinner or the finding of a dead mouse in the laundry. Those I can do faster.
P.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:16 pm (UTC)I haven't been able to bring myself to do the paperwork to get paid for them. I guess I should work on that.
P.
unrelatedly
Date: 2010-08-29 06:29 pm (UTC)Re: unrelatedly
Date: 2010-08-29 07:57 pm (UTC)Ahem. Yes, I'm very glad to know. Actually, I'm over the moon. Wow. Thank you.
It's still summer here, though the light is starting to creep around to the point where one looks up and thinks, "Oh, yes, it's fall now."
P.
Re: unrelatedly
Date: 2010-08-29 08:02 pm (UTC)