pameladean: (Default)
[personal profile] pameladean
Thank you all so much for your kind comments to both of my previous posts.

When I posted about my deadline, I was moving a lot of scenes around in chapters 26, 27, and 28. I have finally escaped from that endless round, and am almost done with Chapter 29. My mother keeps asking me how many chapters there will be, and I keep telling her that I am not Steven Brust and I don't know. There are presently four unplundered chapters, the last four of what was once Volume 2 (and still is, I hasten to add, in multiple backups; nobody needs to fret about it). In the three-chapter adventure, I consolidated three trips into a market town into one, and I am now expanding a scene with a unicorn (you know there had to be at least one), after which I will consolidate two separate social events into one gigantic one. My main concerns about continuity at the moment have to do with an assigned essay that nobody writes -- how emblematic -- and a number of letters that must be either left out, in which case references to them have to be eradicated; or else inserted into different places in the narrative, their original places having been moved or deleted, in which case references to them have to be stabilized.

Of course, the bits I'm worrying about aren't the ones I'm worried about, if you follow me. I'm worried about the ones I'm not worried about because I've forgotten they are problematic.

Also, it is not going to be 100,000 words long. I'm hoping for no more than 130,000; and then it can be [livejournal.com profile] sdn's problem. I have to leave her something to do, after all.

Pamela

Date: 2010-10-11 11:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sdn.livejournal.com
Also, it is not going to be 100,000 words long. I'm hoping for no more than 130,000; and then it can be [livejournal.com profile] sdn's problem. I have to leave her something to do, after all.

Hm. Some options.

1. Cut every other word.
2. Cut the first and last chapter.
3. Cut the last three chapters and throw in some vampires.

Aren't these GREAT ideas?

Date: 2010-10-11 11:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sdn.livejournal.com
1. It would also be literary (see 2).
2. Okay.
3. You do have a love triangle.

Date: 2010-10-12 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lutin.livejournal.com
Can I have your editor?
Actually, can I have your editor over for tea with my thesis advisor?

Date: 2010-10-16 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lutin.livejournal.com
Surprising --- and hilarious. Good luck not choking on tea while you laugh!

Novels

Date: 2010-10-11 11:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] markiv1111.livejournal.com
Sometimes I wonder both *that* and *why* I ever thought I could be a writer. I have no idea how somebody in your situation could handle all the juggling and internal editing that you are doing. I'm sure the end result will be worth it, but still....

Nate

Date: 2010-10-11 11:34 pm (UTC)
ext_345282: (Default)
From: [identity profile] orcaarrow.livejournal.com
Good fortune. I know you are going through quite a bit to get this book finished for us. I know it will be worth all the blood, sweat, and toil.

Date: 2010-10-11 11:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magentamn.livejournal.com
Not to mention tears...

Confusion has its place

Date: 2010-10-12 12:56 am (UTC)
carbonel: Beth wearing hat (Default)
From: [personal profile] carbonel
Ann Arbor, isn't it?

And I see you and [livejournal.com profile] sdn have already made the Zelazny joke. I think that one is a funny-always.

Stephanie Meyer notwithstanding, my theory is that vampires and werewolves are an exclusive-or thing. If you have one, you shouldn't have the other. And zombies can just stay in the grave where they belong.

Re: Confusion has its place

Date: 2010-10-14 03:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elizabethth.livejournal.com
But just this once, what's signal and what's noise?

Had to google it, though, because my brain no longer retrieves information, just gives me the nigglingly familiar feeling . . .

Re: Confusion has its place

Date: 2010-10-12 11:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com
Terry Pratchett might get a pass on this. BUT NO ONE ELSE. Not even Tolkien.

Re: Confusion has its place

Date: 2010-10-13 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com
Tolkien did, alas, have both vampires and werewolves, if you look at the whole (ahem) corpus. Various walking-dead things, but nothing you could really call a zombie.

Re: Confusion has its place

Date: 2010-10-13 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tunxeh.livejournal.com
Is it acceptable if it's vampire and werewolf rather than vampires and werewolves? I thought that part worked ok in Gaiman's The Graveyard Book.

Re: Confusion has its place

Date: 2010-10-14 03:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elizabethth.livejournal.com
That should be "Stephenie Meyer, two out of every three urban fantasies, and half of all paranormal romances aside..." (Including a series with a vampire/werewolf hybrid as protagonist.)

Date: 2010-10-12 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lutin.livejournal.com
Progress! Or, Promised Progress™!
I'll drink tea to that :)

Profile

pameladean: (Default)
pameladean

January 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2025 01:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios