Everybody's from Porlock Now
Jan. 6th, 2007 10:52 pmI just got a nudge from
gypsy1969. I didn't realize I had made no entries for four weeks.
Raphael and I went to the Art Institute on the last day of a special exhibit of Old Masters. One of them was Salvatore Rosa's "Lucrezia as the Personification of Poetry." We went back to look at it several times, and both of us thought of Coleridge's person from Porlock, who interrupted the writing of "Kubla Khan." Raphael spoke first, however, the words that now appear on my new icon. Raphael surprised me with the icon last night, and it is really a good one for my mood at the moment.
Here's a link to an image of the painting:
http://www.oceansbridge.com/oil-paintings/product.php?xProd=60514&xSec=6
The novel in progress is very much alive, but it is in the stomping around and jeering stage, rather than at the point where it might bolt with me and see us both safely to the end. It's going to be so enormous.
The weather is freakish, not in the realm of New York's or Washington's, but freakish for Minnesota. We do have snow, and we are going to have daytime temperatures below freezing for a few days. But it's just all wrong. On a day-to-day bsis the lack of bone-chilling cold and feet of snow make life easier, but I doubt that a little ease will be worth the price that we'll pay.
I'd better get back to tearing my hair out and brandishing my pen. I do read LJ, and will continue to do so.
P.
Raphael and I went to the Art Institute on the last day of a special exhibit of Old Masters. One of them was Salvatore Rosa's "Lucrezia as the Personification of Poetry." We went back to look at it several times, and both of us thought of Coleridge's person from Porlock, who interrupted the writing of "Kubla Khan." Raphael spoke first, however, the words that now appear on my new icon. Raphael surprised me with the icon last night, and it is really a good one for my mood at the moment.
Here's a link to an image of the painting:
http://www.oceansbridge.com/oil-paintings/product.php?xProd=60514&xSec=6
The novel in progress is very much alive, but it is in the stomping around and jeering stage, rather than at the point where it might bolt with me and see us both safely to the end. It's going to be so enormous.
The weather is freakish, not in the realm of New York's or Washington's, but freakish for Minnesota. We do have snow, and we are going to have daytime temperatures below freezing for a few days. But it's just all wrong. On a day-to-day bsis the lack of bone-chilling cold and feet of snow make life easier, but I doubt that a little ease will be worth the price that we'll pay.
I'd better get back to tearing my hair out and brandishing my pen. I do read LJ, and will continue to do so.
P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:55 am (UTC)And see if you can find time to take a break at the end of March, because it's looking entirely likely that I'll be visiting your fair city then. (-:
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:59 am (UTC)I had BETTER be done by then.
P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 05:03 am (UTC)That aside, I'm glad you're making progress, even though it's at the stomping around and jeering stage--it'll get past that, I'm sure.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 05:17 am (UTC)P.
Speaking of selling reproductions
Date: 2007-01-07 05:45 am (UTC)http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2006/09/13/equineartfraud/
This woman is a dear friend of mine. Her work is amazing.
Re: Speaking of selling reproductions
Date: 2007-01-07 03:32 pm (UTC)Re: Speaking of selling reproductions
Date: 2007-01-07 04:21 pm (UTC)However, I'm not sure the paintings are displayed in the same order as on the front page of the article, and the lighting is different (glaring on one of them), and they're pictured smaller.
So that may not really make it any better.
I was thinking the left-hand on the front page was the real one, because it was less contrasty and had more shadow detail. But that also makes it less dramatic, so who knows?
Re: Speaking of selling reproductions
Date: 2007-01-07 05:56 pm (UTC)Re: Speaking of selling reproductions
Date: 2007-01-07 10:38 pm (UTC)P.
Re: Speaking of selling reproductions
Date: 2007-01-08 02:17 pm (UTC)I was thinking just the opposite, that the one on the right had more life. But as you says, who knows? And that's just silly. It totally obviates the point of the article, that Fakes Are Bad. If you can't tell the difference, does it matter?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 05:18 am (UTC)Thanks for the nudge; I'd been meaning to post for some time, but even having a grand new icon didn't quite put me over the edge.
P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:35 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:36 pm (UTC)And exactly. I had to move away from Minneapolis, live in Massachusetts for four years, and then move back, before I went to Minnehaha Falls.
P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 06:28 am (UTC)*goes back to lurking*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:36 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 08:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:37 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 12:37 am (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 01:15 pm (UTC)Nobody else wanted to turn the car around and go there, but before that I'd never quite taken in that it was a real place. It's on the North Devon coast, and I expect it's lined with identical ugly semis facing away from the sea, full of people interrupting each other to ask "What's wrong with a tune you can whistle?"
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:44 pm (UTC)As for the ugly semis (and I know what you mean, but my first thought was of large container trucks, which was pretty funny, and certainly ugly):
"Porlock Weir, only 2 miles away, is a quaint little harbour with a unique charm that has to be experienced. It also boasts the remains of a prehistoric forest, small parts of which are occasionally visible still at a very low tide, and it was here that some remains of an Aurochs were found. These are now on display in the Visitor Centre in Porlock."
Oh, fine, I forgot to save the link, but it's the first thing that comes up if you just Google for Porlock.
"And just try to find an Aurochs." *sniff*
P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 12:57 am (UTC)(Just popping across from Mary Kay's LJ.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 02:49 pm (UTC)Your novel is going through its terrible twos?
Oh god, if all novelist go through that, I'm surprised Proust survived Remembrance Of Things Past*...
_____
*Which is something I've been wanting to read. I was tempted to find a copy & take it with me when I took the bus to Fargo. Instead I took a coupl'a nice, juicy Star Trek novels.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 06:48 pm (UTC)Hope we'll be able to meet your book soon, once you've made it fit for company.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:03 pm (UTC)(Re the cap notion: You would then also have the option of snatching it off, hurling it to the floor, and stamping on it.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 10:40 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-07 10:35 pm (UTC)Kevin's actually never been to the MIA so it'd be fun to take him there and show him my favorite pieces from their permanent collection. Mostly Impressionist stuff, but I'm also very fond of the Rembrandt of Lucretia (probably 'cuz my Mom told me the story behind the painting when I was a kid).
[And good to see a post from you, of course. Good luck with the book stuff!]
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 05:31 am (UTC)R and I were tired, but stayed til the museum closed, looking at random articles of the permanent collection.
[Thanks!]
P.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-16 08:18 pm (UTC)I skimmed through a few pages of archives and enjoyed reading your thoughts on LM Montgomery and Laura Ingalls Wilder. I did really hope to read a eulogy for Owen Jenkins, so I skipped to the end of your journal, but saw that you started shortly after he died. I took what I think was his last class, and he taught me an incredible amount about reading and writing.