Nodding in
Feb. 5th, 2005 03:29 pmHave been neglecting you all shamefully. Am behind on everything. However, this fussy coy short story has finally decided that, dusty and cluttered and shabby as my brain is, it will condescend to take over it on a temporary basis. I hope to be done and catching up on LJ in a week or so.
Notes to self: Barbara Boxer is my hero, I am pretty darn pleased with Mark Dayton too, I adore the State Supreme Court of New York, and when I can't stand things any more I amuse myself in a dark way by trying to decide if Alberto Gonzales belongs at Wolfram and Hart or if Wolfram and Hart is too good for him.
P.
Notes to self: Barbara Boxer is my hero, I am pretty darn pleased with Mark Dayton too, I adore the State Supreme Court of New York, and when I can't stand things any more I amuse myself in a dark way by trying to decide if Alberto Gonzales belongs at Wolfram and Hart or if Wolfram and Hart is too good for him.
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 09:42 pm (UTC)And Wolfram and Hart is way too good for Alberto Gonzales.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 10:28 pm (UTC)Enjoy the story autocracy.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 04:55 am (UTC)P.
Oh, darn. Who let you in on the secret?
Date: 2005-02-06 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 10:49 pm (UTC)B
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 04:54 am (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 04:26 pm (UTC)B
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 10:59 pm (UTC)Since you mentioned Barbara Boxer, I wanted to make sure you know about the Barbara Boxer Rose Campaign that's afoot for Valentine's Day. I heard about it from
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 04:54 am (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 11:11 pm (UTC)but I really think that Wolfram and Hart would turn Gonzales away.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 11:22 pm (UTC)Sen. Dayton is my hero too.
Good to see the story hasn't gnawed your head off; equally good that you have not had to risk life and limb pursuing it.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 04:53 am (UTC)P.
NY State court decision
Date: 2005-02-06 12:30 am (UTC)---------
Guess you're referring to the decision supporting the right of any 2 adults to get married. I was happy to hear what this brave judge decided, but I don't have much hope that it won't be overturned.
Anyhow, some day, which we may not live to see, there will be all kinds of inspiring Gay History Month programming on TV and people will watch it and wonder how their otherwise reasonable ancestors (that would be Our Generation) could have such delusional beliefs about gay people.
Re: NY State court decision
Date: 2005-02-06 04:52 am (UTC)I'm sorry to hear from somebody nearer the story that you think the decision will be overturned. I was about to ask if New York was really more bigoted and narrow-minded and hateful than Massachusetts, but of course the Massachusetts decision was by the highest court in the state, and this one wasn't.
I really want to live long enough to see Gay History specials on PBS. It would be such a nice change from PBS's present behavior, the cravens.
P.
Re: NY State court decision
Date: 2005-02-06 01:43 pm (UTC)Re: NY State court decision
Date: 2005-02-06 04:28 pm (UTC)The decision was going to be appealed, if at all possible. And if it wasn't, another case would have been put together to send up the chain. The court stayed the decision so that it could be appealed, and the mayor did the reasonable thing.
We do need a decisive ruling.
B
Re: NY State court decision
Date: 2005-02-07 02:42 pm (UTC)I guess I shouldn't have called Bloomberg an asshole, but his football-stadium/Olympics obsession has turned me against him. But that's a whole nother can of worms.
Eva
Re: NY State court decision
Date: 2005-02-07 03:05 pm (UTC)B
LOL
Date: 2005-02-06 02:05 am (UTC)Alberto Gonzales I know all too well, but I couldn't figure out your comment about "Wolfram and Hart". I had to Google the web to find out--there are a lot of very clever web sites out there that try not to give it away. Most of them had a Careers link, which cracked me up.
Re: LOL
Date: 2005-02-06 04:08 am (UTC)I didn't know about the web sites. That's hilarious.
I didn't mean to be quite so obscure. Notes to self indeed.
P.
Re: LOL
Date: 2005-02-06 03:37 pm (UTC)I don't think you were obscure, really. I worked two 55-hour weeks in a row and then was sick all day yesterday, so I think most of the obscurity was on my side.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 02:54 am (UTC)(i use this icon to signify: editor)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 04:08 am (UTC)The icon is quite imposing!
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 04:56 am (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 08:18 am (UTC)MKK
no subject
Date: 2005-02-06 07:24 am (UTC)In 1998, in fact, I voted for her over her opponent, who was, believe it or not, named after me. Republican nominee Matt Fong is the son of longtime California pol March Fong Eu and her ex-husband, Chester Fong. Chester was one of my father's best friends in dental school; they're still in touch via email. Chester and March adopted their son shortly after I was born, and they named him after me.
Actually, in 1998, we had an open primary, after a ballot initiative allowing such passed (though it was later reversed by judges acting on behalf of panicked legislators). The leaders in the Republican race for the Senate nomination were Fong and Darrell Issa, a neocon representative from San Diego or someplace equally nasty. Issa made his fortune manufacturing automobile alarms; you know, the kind that go off if a bird happens to flap its wings within 100 meters of the car. As I am of the opinion that Issa should not rise to higher office, I crossed party lines in the primary to vote for my namesake, but just as importantly against Issa.
Issa was also the architect of the lunatic recall of the mostly competent Governor Gray Davis a couple of years ago. It was his clever plant to get himself into the governor's office by stealth (since the superhigh energy prices Davis was stuck with having the state pay were engineered by those rotten bastards at Enron). Then Arnold Schwarzenegger realized he would surely rise to the top of this mess on his name recognition alone. When Arnold entered the race, Issa wept. So there was one good thing that came out of that mess.
And here I used to think that Minnesota politics was crazy!
no subject
Date: 2005-02-08 03:34 am (UTC)~faerie_music's behind the times friend who doens't have her own lj
no subject
Date: 2005-02-08 07:56 am (UTC)I thought of naming my journal that; maybe some other time.
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-08 02:36 pm (UTC)New Convert! *bows low*
Date: 2005-02-14 11:34 pm (UTC)P.S.--Would you mind terribly if I added you to my friends list?
Re: New Convert! *bows low*
Date: 2005-02-15 07:03 pm (UTC)Please feel free to friend me. I can't friend everybody who does that or I would never get any work done, but I do stroll through my list periodically and peek at journals I haven't looked at before.
P.
Re: New Convert! *bows low*
Date: 2005-02-15 11:59 pm (UTC)*whispers to herself*: To actually MEET one of my gods... O.O *feels faint* (And yes, my other gods are all authors too... ^^;;)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 02:57 am (UTC)thank you for a lovely book which kept me sane through high school and beyond. though i go to a massive public university instead of a little liberal-arts college, i've got friends at both macalester and carleton and whenever i walk through i think of janet and thomas and professor medeous.
i would be honored if you would let me "friend" you. (yay for verbing nouns...)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 04:39 am (UTC)Do please feel to friend me. All my posts so far are public, so it's not much of an honor at the moment, but you never know.
"Friend" has been a verb for a long time. "I will friend you, if I may/In the dark and cloudy day," says Housman in "Terence, This is Stupid Stuff" (which is the poem that contains the famous line about how malt does more than Milton can to justify God's ways to man). But of course the LJ meaning is specialized.
P.
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 09:03 pm (UTC)Hello in there? Hello...?
Date: 2005-03-20 12:55 am (UTC)But if you're writing, pretend I didn't say any of this.
--Emma
Re: Hello in there? Hello...?
Date: 2005-03-20 01:42 am (UTC)Brust is indeed a very irritating weblogger. Just when you have given up on him altogether he writes something about the meltdown of his Linux box, in the manner of Patrick O'Brian. And then he disappears.
The narcissus won't be up for weeks, however, so I hope I have some small excuse.
P.