I'll put the quiz results behind a cut tag to spare people annoyance. I saw this on
pnh's journal first, but several other fannish friends of mine have taken it. I was much startled by how well I did, but I will remark at once that it is quite uncanny how often I had not read the work quoted but had read all three of the alternatives given amongst the multiple choices. I'd have been toast if I'd just had to write down the answers without any prompting.
I also can't help wondering if there are some ringers (i.e., non-existent works) in there, or if there are just some overlapping titles that the quiz-maker chose the lesser-known version of, to be wicked. There's a fair amount of mild wickedness in the choice of the possible answers, and I enjoyed it.
Veteran Reader You have a Geek Lore rating of 75% |
If you're not quite as widely or deeply-read as a few, you're still thousands of pages ahead of most. Your grasp of the speculative fiction field is worthy of note. Take a bow. |
|
My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender: | You scored higher than 99% on Geek Lore |
|
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:45 am (UTC)Still, it said I was 99th percentile as well.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:12 pm (UTC)If I designed quizzes, I'd go about asking people how they recall books and what sticks with them, and then do a whole series using all their different criteria -- plots, neat ideas, main characters, landscape, prose style (that's really how I got a lot of my answers right when I couldn't actually recall anything else much), and so on.
Luckily, I don't design quizzes.
P.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 06:27 am (UTC)1300-odd people have taken the test now, and every single one of them, even the people with 0-30%, gets "higher than 99% on geek lore," so it's probable that function is broken. Nothing I adjust within the quiz architecture seems to have any further control over it, grumble.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 08:31 am (UTC)Fun quiz anyway, though vexing because I want to go out and find that fictional Vernor Vinge story.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:08 pm (UTC)P.
finding that fictional story
Date: 2005-08-24 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:10 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:07 pm (UTC)I very seldom recall opening lines per se, though of course some are memorable.
P.
Just call me Ms. Geek
Date: 2005-08-23 09:27 pm (UTC)A pity there isn't an answer key available somewhere - I'd like to know which ones I missed.
Re: Just call me Ms. Geek
Date: 2005-08-24 02:55 am (UTC)Re: I am quite startled
Date: 2005-08-24 03:04 am (UTC)i had read the short stories though, and the wording from those rang a louder bell.
interesting, to see it so strongly pointed out how much about the book a writer can put into the hook, how much of a sense of the atmosphere.